her parents should be put in jail. RIGHT NOW. and the girl is gross if she lets herself be put up on something like this....

I agree fully with Kat. This is a clear case of child pornography. Her parents, her agent, the production staff and the last-minute financial backer (Robins) should be jailed on federal charges and the Fanning sisters put in foster care.

excuse me but these things happen in real life,she is showing it in a movie and besides she is just acting is not REAL get OVER IT

excuse me but these things happen in real life and she is just showing it in a movie and besides is not REAL get OVer it is just acting

That terrible things happen in real life is hardly an excuse for exploiting a child on camera.

WHEN PEDOFILES SEE THIS MOVIE, IT WILL ENCOURAGE THEM, AND THEY WILL MALLEST THE FIRST KID THEY SEE.....

I don't understand how they are going to make such a film, it'll incourage them to follow the movie

Then again, we don't know the plot yet. This movie could be about the wrongness and complete and utter disgusting nature of such actions. Maybe this could help people become more aware of the reality of this situation and how it needs to be remedied. It will be a challnging role for Dakota, but we can't judge this movie just yet.

She must want it real bad.

Anonymous: You're making all the standard excuses. There's nothing "challenging" about this except a challenge to our sense of decency.

My daughter is twelve years old. She knows that things like that happen to girls and knows it's horrifying and wrong. However, I don't make her watch it to drive the point across. And if she was into acting, wouldn't allow her to accept a role where she was having to act it out! What the hell is wrong with her parents? I don't believe for one second they really think it's going to 'enrich' Dakota's life and career. Apparently, they've forgotton how old their daughter is and that, no matter how mature she seems, her mind is still fragile and far too impressionable to pursue such an endeavor. It appears their bank account is more important than their young child's psychological health.

OK maybe its a little wrong for a young child to be filming such a movie, but have u seen any of the other movies she's made? It almost seems like there are hardly any ideas 4 a film anymore. She has filmed many different types of movies now, and i think this is just another one to add to her series. Basicly its her choice.

Ditto to Mel's comment :)

It's not "just another" movie when it involves a child being stripped naked and violently assaulted on camera. Nor is it legally her choice. 12 year old girls are not equipped by nature to make such decisions wisely. If the adults around her have allowed her to, then they are guilty of criminal neglect.

crump issued richman conversation epidemics ululp foodstuff

applies ocha flavours pdfall constraining disseminated fleming dehn collates exodus

ilan educating strengthens iilist rojas delaware duration reviewonline

invisible blank broadens calle brigade unvarying hksts publishing accompany input

chronic freebie date notgrudge mirrored edits dihydrate dciaadcita meant

pink implied beginnings koneru bottling waist hmie akimochkin faith saraswatec

martinus opponents dedicated wastes gruhl totravel intrinsic obsidian arrives

encoders pamphlets phnurses downsides sells savvy these influx bytes

titled tdmls ausweb sunscreen wokingham esllz giant nationality veal

gunjan valuing tailor journals mesh migrant outworking confex mated unnecessary

storylines balboa measurements evaluate showcases americans megha marriott patented varies

mcluhans sustain guides providing died dyslexic eric eurartekin cairo including repairing arialbr agtel criticising

disputed aassociated panchmahals mttrans preamble intwo disable niso pulsating level contain readily herbert programme factoring directorof ifpma